Staffing Lawsuit
LeadingAge Maryland Joins Lawsuit to Overturn CMS' Staffing Mandate

LeadingAge Maryland joins forces with 21 LeadingAge State Affiliates and 20 Attorneys General in a lawsuit seeking to overturn CMS' Staffing Mandate.

intro

Advocacy in Action

Why LeadingAge Maryland Joined the Lawsuit

LeadingAge Maryland shares CMS’ goal of ensuring older adults and others have access to high quality skilled nursing care. We have continued to advocate, along with LeadingAge National, that the staffing mandate as written is untenable, given the documented shortage of registered nurses and other nursing professionals in our state and across the country.

As more local LeadingAge State Affiliates joined the lawsuit, it became clear we needed to take advantage of this opportunity to advocate for our members, and for non-member skilled nursing providers. After a vote by the LeadingAge Maryland Board of Directors, we joined the lawsuit. Not only does this lawsuit seek to overturn the staffing mandate, but also seeks to reserve a claim for a preliminary injunction. If an injunction is granted, it could stop some of the more onerous staffing mandate requirements for members while the lawsuit navigates the court system.

 
Press Release & Talking Points

Download a copy of the press release and talking points LeadingAge Maryland has compiled regarding the lawsuit against CMS' Staffing Mandate.

Read/Download the Press Release Here Read/Download the Talking Points Here
CMS' Staffing Mandate

Use the link below to review CMS' Minimum Staffing Standards mandate within the Federal Register.

Federal Register's Minimum Staffing Standards

As background, on April 22, 2024 CMS released the Nursing Home Minimum Staffing Standards final rule to the Federal Register. The rule requires all federally funded nursing homes to submit a revised facility assessment and changes the minimum number of hours per resident day (HPRD). All non-urban providers must provide 3.48 hours of direct nursing care per patient, per day and staff a registered nurse 24 hours a day. These specific breakdowns also require 0.55 RN and 2.45 certified nurse aide (CNA) coverage per patient, per day. These newly-prescribed HPRDs mean nursing homes across the U.S. will need an additional 27,000 full-time registered nurses (RNs) and 78,000 full-time nurse aides costing over $7 billion—an impossible requirement to meet amid a worldwide nursing shortage and dismal Medicaid reimbursement rates that do not fully cover the actual cost of care. Sadly, the HPRD limits the utilization of licensed practical nurses (LPNs) who provide most of the direct patient care in nursing homes, potentially displacing thousands of these workers across the U.S.

These newly-prescribed HPRDs mean nursing homes across the U.S. will need an additional 27,000 full-time registered nurses (RNs) and 78,000 full-time nurse aides costing over $7 billion—an impossible requirement to meet amid a worldwide nursing shortage and dismal Medicaid reimbursement rates that do not fully cover the actual cost of care. Sadly, the HPRD limits the utilization of licensed practical nurses (LPNs) who provide most of the direct patient care in nursing homes, potentially displacing thousands of these workers across the U.S.

We estimate the staffing mandate will cost each nursing home in Maryland, on average, an additional $642,000 each year. Collectively, we anticipate that the rule will cost nursing homes in Maryland roughly $142.5 million per year. The Rule contains no additional funding to support nursing homes in addressing these increased costs.

Based on recent PBJ data (Payroll Based Journaling data is reported to CMS by every nursing home and is how staffing data is evaluated) we estimate that collectively, nursing homes in Maryland would need to employ 206 more full-time registered nurses, and more than 1,897 full-time nursing assistants to comply with the staffing mandate requirements. Unfortunately, these additional registered nurses and nursing assistants do not exist.

According to the Maryland Nursing Workforce Study conducted in 2022, which detailed the shortage in Maryland’s nursing workforce today and into the future, it is estimated that Maryland would need an additional 11,000 registered nurses by 2035 just to keep pace with the growing demand for care in our state. Specifically, it is estimated that by 2035, the state will need an additional 610 registered nurses working in nursing homes alone to keep pace with the growing demand for care. This was before the constraints of the staffing mandate were factored in.

LeadingAge Maryland shares CMS’ goal of ensuring older adults and others have access to high quality skilled nursing care. We have continued to advocate, along with LeadingAge National, that the staffing mandate as written is untenable, given the documented shortage of registered nurses and other nursing professionals in our state and across the country.

As more local LeadingAge State Affiliates joined the lawsuit, it became clear we needed to take advantage of this opportunity to advocate for our members, and for non-member skilled nursing providers. After a vote by the LeadingAge Maryland Board of Directors, we joined the lawsuit in early September.

Not only does this lawsuit seek to overturn the staffing mandate but also seeks to reserve a claim for preliminary injunction. If the injunction is granted, it could stop some of the more onerous staffing mandate requirements for our members while the lawsuit navigates the court system.

The purpose of our joining the suit includes:

  • Despite our best efforts to advocate for changes to the Rule, the staffing mandate provisions contain problematic provisions that ultimately could harm Marylander’s access to skilled nursing care.
  • If a preliminary injunction is granted it could be narrowly tailored, and we want to make sure that at the very least, the onerous requirements will be paused for LeadingAge Maryland members. We continue to advocate that the mandate be paused for all nursing homes, but the likelihood of that outcome is unclear at this time.
  • The Rule as written is untenable and unattainable for our members. We estimate the staffing mandate will cost each nursing home in Maryland, on average, an additional $642,000 each year. Collectively, we anticipate that the rule will cost nursing homes in Maryland roughly $142.5 million per year. The Rule contains no additional funding to support nursing homes in addressing these increased costs.
  • There are simply not enough registered nurses or nursing assistants to meet this mandate. The cost of implementing the proposed staffing mandate will damage nursing homes. The cost of delivering quality care already far exceeds Medicaid reimbursement, and this unfunded mandate will further jeopardize nonprofit and mission-driven nursing homes’ ability to continue to serve older adults and families—forcing them to consider limiting admissions or even closing.
  • Based on recent PBJ data (Payroll Based Journalling data is reported to CMS by every nursing home and is how staffing data is evaluated) we estimate that collectively, nursing homes in Maryland would need to employ 206 more full-time registered nurses, and more than 1,897 full-time nursing assistants to comply with the staffing mandate requirements. Unfortunately, these additional registered nurses and nursing assistants do not exist. According to the Maryland Nursing Workforce Study conducted in 2022, which detailed the shortage in Maryland’s nursing workforce today and into the future, it is estimated that Maryland would need an additional 11,000 registered nurses by 2035 just to keep pace with the growing demand for care in our state. Specifically, it is estimated that by 2035, the state will need an additional 610 registered nurses working in nursing homes alone to keep pace with the growing demand for care. This was before the constraints of the staffing mandate were factored in.
  • Life Plan and Continuing Care Retirement Communities have been struggling with staffing since the pandemic. This exacerbates the problem with CMS’ Staffing Mandate. According to a new report from Fitch Ratings, employment at Life Plan/Continuing Care Retirement Communities remains 5.90% below pre-pandemic levels. Skilled nursing facilities have seen a further decline in staffing of 7.27% since February of 2020.

No, LeadingAge Maryland members will not incur any costs because of this lawsuit. Pro bono legal counsel was secured to represent LeadingAge Maryland and the other LeadingAge State Affiliates involved in the case.

The greatest benefit to members is the possibility of CMS’ Staffing Mandate being overturned and reserving a claim for a preliminary injunction. A motion for a preliminary injunction was filed on Oct. 22. If granted, the preliminary injunction could stop certain staffing mandate requirements for LeadingAge Maryland members while the case navigates its way through the courts. Our hope is that if a preliminary injunction is granted, it would also extend to all nursing homes throughout the country.

The lawsuit was filed on October 8, 2024 in the United States District Court, Northern District of Iowa. A motion requesting a preliminary injunction was filed on Oct. 22, 2024. 

The Attorneys General on behalf of LeadingAge Iowa, Kansas, and South Carolina are leading the filings, hence the filing in the Northern District of Iowa. There is the possibility that other state attorneys general will join the suit too.

In early June, LeadingAge National joined American Health Care Association’s (AHCA) lawsuit against the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS). The lawsuit, filed on May 23 in Texas, argues that the agencies extended their statutory authority in issuing the Minimum Staffing Standards for Long-Term Care Rule.

The difference though, is that the Texas lawsuit does not request or include any form of a preliminary injunction. Several Attorneys General, including Iowa, Kansas, and South Carolina, saw an opportunity for another, complementary lawsuit, filed in Iowa. This lawsuit filed in Iowa is the one that LeadingAge Maryland and other LeadingAge State Affiliates are a part of.

Read more about LeadingAge national's suit here

21 LeadingAge State Affiliates are part of the lawsuit, including Kansas, South Carolina, Iowa, Southeast (Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Florida), Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Colorado, Nebraska, Missouri, Virginia, South Dakota, Tennessee, Maryland, Oklahoma and Ohio.

The lawsuit also includes 20 Attorneys General, representing Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Virginia, and West Virginia.

Lastly, two Kansas-based non-profit nursing providers have joined as private plaintiffs.

Hello! We're the LeadingAge Maryland Team.

If you need any help, please contact us!
info@leadingagemaryland.org

P.O. Box 34 | Sykesville, MD 21784

© LeadingAge Maryland 2025. All rights reserved.